MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109450366 · doi:10.1109/icdm.2006.94

Latent Dirichlet Co-Clustering

2006· article· en· W2109450366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLatent Dirichlet allocationCluster analysisDocument clusteringComputer scienceCorrelation clusteringMarkov chain Monte CarloDirichlet distributionBiclusteringCanopy clustering algorithmCURE data clustering algorithmTopic modelHierarchical Dirichlet processMixture modelArtificial intelligenceBrown clusteringData miningMathematicsBayesian probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a generative model for simultaneously clustering documents and terms. Our model is a four-level hierarchical Bayesian model, in which each document is modeled as a random mixture of document topics , where each topic is a distribution over some segments of the text. Each of these segments in the document can be modeled as a mixture of word topics where each topic is a distribution over words. We present efficient approximate inference techniques based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo method and a moment-matching algorithm for empirical Bayes parameter estimation. We report results in document modeling, document and term clustering, comparing to other topic models, Clustering and Co-Clustering algorithms including latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), model-based overlapping clustering (MOC), model-based overlapping co-clustering (MOCC) and information-theoretic co-clustering (ITCC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it