Multi-level multi-objective decision problem through fuzzy random regression based objective function
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A multi-level decision making problem confronts several issues especially in coordinating decision in hierarchic processes and in compromising conflicting objectives for each decision level. Therefore, its mathematical model plays a pivotal role in solving such problem, and is influencing to the final result. However, it is sometimes difficult to estimate the coefficients of objective functions of the model in real situations specifically when the statistical data contain random and fuzzy information. Thus, decision making scheme should provide an appropriate method to handle the presence of such uncertainties. Hence, this paper proposes a fuzzy random regression method to estimate the coefficients value for the objective functions of multi-level multi-objective model. The algorithm is constructed to obtain a satisfaction solution, which fulfills at least weak Pareto optimality. A numerical example illustrates the proposed solution procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it