MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109496241 · doi:10.1154/1.1483322

Modeling of hP3 intermetallics in space group P-3m1: Calculated powder patterns from CRYSTMET <sup>®</sup> X-ray cell data and <i>ab initio</i> coordinates

2002· article· en· W2109496241 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePowder Diffraction · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersCentre of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Studies, Stellenbosch University
KeywordsAb initioCrystallographyType (biology)IntermetallicAb initio quantum chemistry methodsSpace groupGroup (periodic table)StoichiometryChemistryPowder diffractionHexagonal crystal systemSpace (punctuation)Materials scienceDiffractionX-ray crystallographyPhysicsPhysical chemistryMoleculeQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are 39 CRYSTMET ® entries in the hexagonal space group P-3m1 (164) reporting both distinct pure phase compounds and atomic coordinates. Having the same Wyckoff positions in the same space group as the C6 structure type, all are isopointal with it. The range of observed c/a values extends from about 0.65 to 1.83. Three types are distinguished: Layered materials with CdI 2 type, the CeCd 2 type which is a slight distortion of the hexagonal AlB 2 type, and the intermediate EuGe 2 type made of the materials AuTe 2 , BaSi 2 , EuGe 2 , and SrGe 2 . Ab initio modeling of the 26 entries with CdI 2 and EuGe 2 type and atomic coordinates reproduces convincingly both their c/a axial ratios and z coordinates. For CoO 2 and SiTe 2 , both c/a and z deviate to a degree from the reported values, indicating that those materials should be reexamined for superstructures, stoichiometry, etc. Ab initio modeling of the 11 cell-and-type entries with CdI 2 type and no coordinates in CRYSTMET reproduced convincingly their reported axial ratios. The X-ray cell data and the ab initio z coordinates were then used in the production of reliable calculated powder patterns for CoTe 2 , CrSe 2 , HfS 2 , HfSe 2 , HfTe 2 , NbTe 2 , SnSe 2 , VS 2 , VTe 2 , ZrS 2 , and ZrTe 2 . All 11 patterns have been inserted in the intense diffraction line search system of CRYSTMET operated under the Materials Toolkit. Comparison of calculated patterns for SnSe 2 and ZrTe 2 with experimental entries in the PDF exposes the complementarity of calculated and experimental powder patterns and suggests that JCPDS pattern #15-223 should be reinterpreted in terms of the CdI 2 structure type. The CeCd 2 ⇔AlB 2 type transformation is modeled and discussed on YCd 2 using both ab initio methods and a hard-sphere model. For z &lt;0.45, the ab initio solution is identical with that from the hard-sphere model while a quantum regime is predicted in the small region 0.45&lt; z &lt;0.467 beyond which YCd 2 abruptly transforms to the AlB 2 type. In spite of the new understanding gained, this modeling fell slightly short of allowing calculation of z values and powder patterns for the materials CaHg 2 , DyHg 2 , ErCd 2 , GdHg 2 , HoCd 2 , HoHg 2 , LuCd 2 , NdCd 2 , SmHg 2 , TbCd 2 , and TbHg 2 with no coordinates in CRYSTMET.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it