Nuclear ultrastructure in bovine oocytes after inhibition of meiosis by chemical and biological inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various components of the ovarian follicle as well as different chemicals can suppress the resumption of meiosis in cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs). In this study the nuclear ultrastructure of bovine COCs was assessed after 8 h of meiotic inhibition with 50 microM roscovitine (ROSC), 50 microM butyrolactone (BL-I), 2 mM 6-DMAP, 2 microM cycloheximide (CX), or a theca cell monolayer (TC). COCs were recovered according to standard in vitro methods, cultured in a simple and defined medium, and processed for transmission electron microscopy. Control COCs were processed before onset of culture and multiple oocytes were evaluated for each treatment. In all groups, the oocyte nucleus presented a dense fibrillar nucleolus consisting of a fibrillar sphere with a fibrillar center. In TC and 6-DMAP inhibited COCs condensed chromatin adhered to the nucleolus while in all other groups the perinuclear chromatin was separated from the nucleolus. In ROSC inhibited COCs, the nuclear envelope presented only slight small amplitude undulation. The BL-I-inhibited COCs presented an intermediate level of low amplitude undulation of the NE. In CX, 6-DMAP, and TC inhibited COCs the nuclear envelope presented extensively low amplitude undulations. In ROSC inhibited COCs, electron-dense granules formed ring-shaped structures. In some of the BL-I inhibited COCs multiple stellate crystal-like structures were found, and in these COCs the nuclear envelope and the perinuclear cisternae appeared less distinct than in the other BL-I inhibited COCs. In 6-DMAP inhibited COCs interchromatin-like granule clusters were present. In conclusion, the oocyte nuclei in all COCs presented a dense fibrillar nucleolus resembling that in control COCs. However, variations were observed in 1) the nuclear envelope morphology; 2) the chromatin location in relation to the nucleolus; and 3) the presence of different populations of intranuclear granules. Although all treatments inhibited oocyte nucleus breakdown, the mechanisms underlying these effects are different and require further characterization. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 59: 459-467, 2001.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".