MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109507330 · doi:10.1109/ias.1997.626283

Electrostatic lubrication of moulds

2002· article· en· W2109507330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInjection Molding Process and Properties
Canadian institutionsCégep de Sorel-TracyWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLubricationMaterials scienceLubricantPowder metallurgyPowder coatingMetallurgyComposite materialCoatingInjection mouldingMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A prototype dry electrostatic powder lubrication system for lubrication of powder metallurgy moulds was designed. The system uses contact electrification to charge the powder and an electric field to aid in uniform coating of the internal surfaces of the mould. The system was mounted on a 200 ton press and the sequence used in lubrication of the mould was compatible with the press sequence in which the parts are produced. Parts which were made using the prototype system and reduced lubricant powder concentration in the metal powder formulation had increased green density and strength while still maintaining equivalent surface finish and mould lubrication for successful moulding of parts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInjection Molding Process and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207