MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109528465 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2009.2031396

Statistical Modeling in the Wavelet Domain for Compact Feature Extraction and Similarity Measure of Images

2009· article· en· W2109528465 on OpenAlexaff
Hua Yuan, Xiao–Ping Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Similarity measureArtificial intelligenceFeature extractionImage retrievalWaveletMixture modelImage textureStatistical modelComputer scienceDivergence (linguistics)Similarity (geometry)Feature (linguistics)Feature vectorWavelet transformMathematicsMeasure (data warehouse)Image processingImage (mathematics)Data mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Image feature extraction and similarity measure in feature space are active research topics. They are basic components in a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) system. In this letter, we present a new statistical model-based image feature extraction method in the wavelet domain and a novel Kullback divergence-based similarity measure. First, a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) and a more systematic generalized Gaussian mixture model (GGMM) are employed to describe the statistical characteristics of the wavelet coefficients and the model parameters are employed to construct a compact image feature space. A nontrivial expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for the GGMM model is derived. Subsequently, a new Kullback divergence-based similarity measure with low-computation cost is derived and analyzed. The Brodatz texture image database and some other image databases are used to evaluate the retrieval performance based on the presented new methods. Experimental results indicate that the GMM and the GGMM-based image texture features are very effective in representing multiscale image characteristics and that the new methods outperforms other conventional wavelet-based methods in retrieval performance with a comparable level of computational complexity. It is also demonstrated that for image features extracted by the new statistical models, the similarity measure based on Kullback divergence is more effective than conventional similarity measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologySame topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207