MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The role of <i>Candida albicans FAR1</i> in regulation of pheromone‐mediated mating, gene expression and cell cycle arrest

2008· article· en· W2109540663 on OpenAlexafffund
Pierre Côté, Malcolm Whiteway

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityBiotechnology Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyPheromoneCandida albicansCell biologyMating typeGeneGene expressionCell cycleRegulatorRegulation of gene expressionCell cycle checkpointGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Candida albicans cells homozygous for the MTLa locus respond to alpha-mating pheromone by activating gene expression and triggering morphological changes, and the cells undergo a pheromone-mediated cell cycle arrest that can be influenced by nutritional conditions. Disruption of C. albicans ORF19.7105, which is the predicted homologue of the yeast FAR1 gene, blocks pheromone-mediated morphological changes, prevents pheromone-mediated cell cycle arrest, greatly compromises mating and also blocks pheromone-triggered gene induction. C. albicans ORF19.7105 is not pheromone inducible, but overexpression of this gene from the actin promoter greatly enhances pheromone-mediated cell cycle arrest, leading to clear halos in growth inhibition assays on a variety of solid media. Transcriptional profiling of the ORF19.7105-overexpressing strain has established an enhanced responsiveness of pheromone-induced genes. Thus the C. albicans FAR1 gene is a dosage-dependent regulator of the pheromone response, and is critically required for all aspects of mating process of this pathogenic fungus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207