Increased Susceptibility of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 Knockout Cells to Antitumor Triazoloacridone C-1305 Is Associated with Permanent G2 Cell Cycle Arrest
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Triazoloacridone C-1305 is a novel inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase II, which exhibits potent antitumor activity toward solid tumors. In this study, antiproliferative action of C-1305 and its close analog C-1533 was investigated in nontransformed mouse fibroblasts and two mutant cell lines in which the PARP-1 gene was specifically disrupted. Unexpectedly, C-1305 very strongly affected proliferation of cells lacking poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1), whereas the action of less active compound C-1533 toward normal and PARP-1-negative cells was comparable. The IC(50) concentration of C-1305 determined for PARP-1 knockout cells was approximately 150-fold lower than that determined for cells with functional PARP-1. Both studied triazoloacridones exhibited very low direct cytotoxicity as evidenced by accumulation of 7-amino-actinomycin D, and only low levels of apoptosis were observed after a 24-h exposure to studied drugs. Analysis of DNA damage induced by C-1305 by the Comet assay showed that this drug induced very low levels of DNA strand breaks. C-1305 strongly affected cell cycle progression in normal and PARP-1 mutant cells and arrested both cell types in G(2)-M phase. However, the G(2)-M arrest induced by C-1305 was greatly prolonged in PARP-1-deficient cells as compared with normal fibroblasts. Together, these results show that mouse cells lacking PARP-1 are extremely sensitive to C-1305, a new topoisomerase II inhibitor. This is in striking contrast with previous reports in which PARP-1-deficient cells were shown to be resistant to classical topoisomerase II inhibitors. Our data also suggest that the PARP-1 status might be essential for the maintenance of the G(2) arrest induced by C-1305.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".