MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109572950 · doi:10.7202/044970ar

Le rapport à l’écrit d’enseignants inuit en formation

2010· article· fr· W2109572950 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Yvonne da Silveira

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes/Inuit/Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La maîtrise de la langue écrite est un facteur incontournable de la réussite scolaire, l’école étant ancrée dans l’écrit. Pour l’élève ou l’enseignant inuit, cela implique d’être confronté à la double réalité d’une culture première, orale, et d’une seconde, scolaire et écrite. Or l’enseignant a pour tâche de socialiser l’élève à cette dernière. À la suite de deux cours portant sur l’identité culturelle, l’éducation et le développement institutionnel donnés aux enseignants inuit dans le cadre d’un programme de formation des maîtres, nous nous sommes intéressée à leur rapport à l’écrit. Nos observations proviennent de cours donnés dans un village du Nunavik à l’automne 2007 et à l’hiver 2008. Notre discussion soulève des questions concernant la formation d’enseignants inuit dans des contextes multiculturels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes/Inuit/StudiesSame topicEducator Training and Historical PedagogyFrench-language works237,207