Physical Model of Noise Mechanisms in SOI and Bulk-Silicon MOSFETs for RF Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The noise mechanisms at high frequencies in MOSFETs are analyzed and an analytical model is presented for devices operating at gigahertz frequencies. The proposed model is applied to floating body silicon-on-insulator (SOI) as well as bulk-silicon MOS transistors and experimentally verified. The model accounts for the mechanisms of 1) channel thermal noise; 2) shot-noise due to impact ionization; and 3) substrate back-gate-coupled thermal noise. Compact, closed-form analytical expressions of the noise power spectral density and the minimum noise figure (NF) are presented. At the same technology level, the experimental data and the model show that SOI MOSFETs are able to attain lower NF than bulk-silicon devices by reduction of the back-gate transconductance. However, the higher drain electric field in the SOI, and the parasitic bipolar action and floating body enhance impact-ionization-associated shot-noise, which becomes the limiting noise mechanism at drain voltages higher than the drain onset voltage of ldquokinkrdquo effect. A correlation between the onset voltage and the DC electrical characteristics is shown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it