MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109610660 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/24/3/035008

Enhancement of microwave tomography through the use of electrically conducting enclosures

2008· article· en· W2109610660 on OpenAlexafffund
Colin Gilmore, Joe LoVetri

Bibliographic record

VenueInverse Problems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersResearch ManitobaManitoba Health Research Council
KeywordsInversion (geology)ConductorTomographyMicrowaveElectrical conductorPerfect conductorTransverse planeMicrowave imagingAcousticsMathematicsOpticsAlgorithmComputer scienceGeometryPhysicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider microwave tomography (MWT) where the imaging region is surrounded by an electrically conducting surface. This surface acts as both a shield from outside interference, holding tank for any possible matching media, and, in certain cases, serves to enhance the performance of electromagnetic (EM) inversion algorithms. For the 2D transverse magnetic (TM) case and where the surface consists of a perfect electrical conductor (PEC) in the shape of a circular cylinder, we formulate an appropriate Greens function which is amenable to implementation in the existing EM inversion codes. We utilize this Greens function in the multiplicative-regularized contrast source inversion (MR-CSI) method. Several different synthetic examples are used to test the performance of the inversion when the PEC surface is present and the results show that in many cases, the tomographic image is significantly improved. The reasons for the improved inversion results are an area of active research, but are likely to be due to the increased interrogation energy deposited into the imaging region. Results are also shown which demonstrate the problems which may arise if the unbounded domain Greens function is used in an MWT system that utilizes a matching medium of finite extent—a problem which is overcome by the inclusion of a PEC surface on the exterior of the MWT system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInverse ProblemsSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207