<i>DE NOVO</i> SEQUENCING WITH LIMITED NUMBER OF POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATIONS PER PEPTIDE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De novo sequencing derives the peptide sequence from a tandem mass spectrum without the assistance of protein databases. This analysis has been indispensable for the identification of novel or modified peptides in a biological sample. Currently, the speed of de novo sequencing algorithms is not heavily affected by the number of post-translational modification (PTM) types in consideration. However, the accuracy of the algorithms can be degraded due to the increased search space. Most peptides in a proteomics research contain only a small number of PTMs per peptide, yet the types of PTMs can come from a large number of choices. Therefore, it is desirable to include a large number of PTM types in a de novo sequencing algorithm, yet to limit the number of PTM occurrences in each peptide to increase the accuracy. In this paper, we present an efficient de novo sequencing algorithm, DeNovoPTM, for such a purpose. The implemented software is downloadable from http://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~l22he/denovo_ptm .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it