MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Role of Genetic Factors in Vascular Access Thrombosis in Hemodialysis Patients

2004· article· en· W2109640415 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fatma Nurhan Özdemir, Fatma Belgin Ataç, A. Akçay, Namık Yaşar Özbek, Mehmet Haberal

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineThrombosisFactor V LeidenMethylenetetrahydrofolate reductaseGastroenterologyProthrombin G20210APopulationHemodialysisVenous thrombosisSurgeryGenotypeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vascular access thrombosis is a frequent complication in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Genetic mutations, inflammation, and changes in the vascular wall are some factors that are thought to increase thrombosis risk. In this study, we tested for possible relationships between vascular thrombosis and some known thrombophilic mutation/polymorphisms in coagulation factors [factor V Leiden (FVL), prothrombin (Pt) G20210A, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR C677T), factor XIII (F‐XIII) Val34Leu, alpha‐fibrinogen (AF) Thr312Ala, factor VII (F‐VII) R353Q] and angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) gene in our HD patients. Patients who had experienced at least 3 episodes of AVF thrombosis composed of the study group, and patients who had never encountered this complication composed of the control group. None of the patients in either group had a history of diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, dialysis‐related amyloidosis, or vasculitis. In order to find the frequency of F‐XIII Val34Leu, AF Thr312Ala, and F‐VII R353Q polymorphisms in our population, we also searched persons without renal disease or history of thrombosis (normal group). Results are summarized in Table. There was a tendency toward thrombotic mutation/polymorphisms in the study group for FVL, Pt G20210A, ACE I/D, and AF Thr312Ala. We suggest that patients who develop recurrent AVF thrombosis should be screened for the above‐mentioned factors and investigated for other possible risk factors. This screening would allow more effective focus on prophylaxis. Genetic mutation/ polymorphism Study group Normal group Control group FVL/heterozygous 13 (n = 46) 7 (n = 81) 24.5 (n = 44) Pt G20210A/ heterozygous 8.7 (n = 46) 2.7 (n = 182) 20 (n = 44) MTHFR C677T/ heterozygous 0 (n = 44) 28.8 (n = 66) 22.3 (n = 44) ACE I/DD/D 44.5 (n = 44) 28.8 (n = 138) 26.2 (n = 29) I/D 36.3 (n = 44) 47.2 (n = 138) 23.1 (n = 29) I/I 18.2 (n = 44) 15.4 (n = 138) 27 (n = 29) F‐XIII/ Val34LeuVal/Val 44.8 (n = 29) 71.5 (n = 112) 52 (n = 25) Val/Leu 51.8 (n = 29) 27.6 (n = 112) 48 (n = 25) Leu/Leu 3.4 (n = 29) 0.9 (n = 112) 0 (n = 25) AF Thr312AlaAla/Thr 83 (n = 24) 58 (n = 119) 83.3 (n = 30) Thr/Thr 12.5 (n = 24) 32.6 (n = 119) 10 (n = 30) Ala/Ala 4.5 (n = 24) 8.4 (n = 119) 6.7 (n = 30) F‐VII R353QR/R 39 (n = 18) 74.5 (n = 98) 31.8 (n = 22) R/Q 34 (n = 18) 23.5 (n = 98) 68.2 (n = 22) Q/Q 27 (n = 18) 2 (n = 98) 0 (n = 22) Values are percentages and numbers in parenthesis represent the number of patients/persons studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis→French-language works237,207→