MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109674387 · doi:10.1063/1.4901546

The principal indecomposable modules of the dilute Temperley-Lieb algebra

2014· article· en· W2109674387 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIndecomposable moduleDimension (graph theory)Algebra over a fieldBilinear formCellular algebraAlgebra representationCurrent algebraFiltered algebra

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Temperley-Lieb algebra \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathsf {TL}_{n}(\beta )$\end{document}TLn(β) can be defined as the set of rectangular diagrams with n points on each of their vertical sides, with all points joined pairwise by non-intersecting strings. The multiplication is then the concatenation of diagrams. The dilute Temperley-Lieb algebra \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathsf {dTL}_{n}(\beta )$\end{document}dTLn(β) has a similar diagrammatic definition where, now, points on the sides may remain free of strings. Like \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathsf {TL}_{n}$\end{document}TLn, the dilute \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathsf {dTL}_{n}$\end{document}dTLn depends on a parameter \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\beta \in \mathbb {C}$\end{document}β∈C, often given as β = q + q−1 for some \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$q\in \mathbb {C}^\times$\end{document}q∈C×. In statistical physics, the algebra plays a central role in the study of dilute loop models. The paper is devoted to the construction of its principal indecomposable modules. Basic definitions and properties are first given: the dimension of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathsf {dTL}_{n}$\end{document}dTLn, its break up into even and odd subalgebras and its filtration through n + 1 ideals. The standard modules \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathsf {S}_{n,k}$\end{document}Sn,k are then introduced and their behaviour under restriction and induction is described. A bilinear form, the Gram product, is used to identify their (unique) maximal submodule \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathsf {R}_{n,k}$\end{document}Rn,k which is then shown to be irreducible or trivial. It is then noted that \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathsf {dTL}_{n}$\end{document}dTLn is a cellular algebra. This fact allows for the identification of complete sets of non-isomorphic irreducible modules and projective indecomposable ones. The structure of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathsf {dTL}_{n}$\end{document}dTLn as a left module over itself is then given for all values of the parameter q, that is, for both q generic and a root of unity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207