MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109697640 · doi:10.1109/iembs.1989.95962

Identification of the time varying mechanics of isolated skeletal muscle

2003· article· en· W2109697640 on OpenAlexaff
Poul M. F. Nielsen, Ian W. Hunter, Robert E. Kearney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStiffnessMuscle stiffnessLinearityHysteresisNonlinear systemSkeletal muscleMechanicsPhysicsMathematicsBiophysicsComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)ChemistryAnatomyThermodynamicsArtificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method for identifying the mechanics of systems with rapidly changing characteristics is presented for the case in which the characteristics of the system are changing in the same order of time as its dynamics. Results of muscle twitch experiments on frogs are presented. The length perturbation input and muscle force output data ensembles were analysed to yield instantaneous measures of muscle stiffness throughout a muscle twitch. The results clearly show muscle stiffness rising and then decaying during twitch. Stiffness as a function of force exhibits no hysteresis, and except at low forces, the relationship is linear. The variance accounted for at low forces is 0.6 compared with values greater than 0.9 at moderate and high forces. This departure from linearity at low forces indicates that nonlinear analysis of muscle mechanics must be performed.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207