A projection from the ventral tegmental area to the periaqueductal gray involved in cardiovascular regulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experiments were done in alpha-chloralose-anesthetized rats to determine a pathway mediating the cardiovascular depressor responses elicited from stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA). The magnitude of the depressor responses elicited by glutamate stimulation (0.1 M/30 nl) of the VTA was examined after neuronal block produced by microinjections of lidocaine into ascending fiber bundles leaving the VTA to innervate the forebrain and thalamus. Bilateral microinjections of 1 microl of 4% lidocaine in the medial forebrain bundle (n = 6) and in the periventricular fibers of the midbrain (n = 5) did not attenuate the depressor response from stimulation of the VTA. Experiments were done using the anterograde tracer biotinylated dextran amine to identify descending projections from the VTA to cardiovascular centers in the brain stem. Examination of the nucleus of the solitary tract, ventrolateral medulla, and A5 catecholaminergic cell group revealed few or no fibers or terminals. Occasional fibers and some terminals were observed in the nucleus of raphe magnus, parabrachial nucleus, and locus ceruleus. A very dense bilateral projection was found to the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (PAGvl) and dorsal raphe nucleus adjacent to the PAGvl. Bilateral injections of 4% lidocaine (n = 4) or 10 mM cobalt chloride (n = 5) into the PAGvl region attenuated the depressor responses elicited by stimulation of the VTA by approximately 50%. These experiments indicate that the depressor responses elicited from activation of the VTA are mediated in part by a pathway to a cardiovascular depressor area located in the PAGvl.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".