MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109714708 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2007.070219

Joint optimization of relay-precoders and decoders with partial channel side information in cooperative networks

2007· article· en· W2109714708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayComputer scienceChannel state informationBeamformingRelay channelDecoding methodsTerminal (telecommunication)Channel (broadcasting)Computer networkTransmission (telecommunications)Joint (building)TelecommunicationsWirelessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We jointly optimize the relay-precoders and decoders with full or partial channel side information (CSI) in a cooperative network. Specifically, three different CSI assumptions are considered: 1) full CSI at the destination terminal and the relay terminals; 2) full CSI at the destination terminal and partial CSI at the relay terminals; 3) partial CSI at the destination terminal and the relay terminals. We show that, under the assumption of full CSI at the destination terminal and the relay terminals, the optimum relay-precoder is the cooperative transmission beamforming and the optimum decoder is a maximum ratio combiner. Under the two partial CSI assumptions, the optimum relay-precoders and decoders work in a fashion of channel selection. It is demonstrated that the proposed optimum relay-precoders and decoders improve the performance considerably

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it