Design and Testing of a 64-Channel Combinatorial Electrochemical Cell
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Design, testing, and performance of a 64-channel combinatorial electrochemical cell are described. This cell is used for high-throughput screening of materials for use as Li-ion rechargeable battery electrodes. Our sealed cell has 64 separate positive electrodes and Li foil for the reference and counter electrodes. This combinatorial electrochemical cell was designed to complement our existing combinatorial materials science infrastructure. Using the combinatorial electrochemical cell decreases the time and labor associated with test cell assembly, improves the repeatability of our assembly procedure, and increases the number of compositions we can test in a given amount of time. In this paper, we demonstrate that the results from the combinatorial electrochemical cell and from conventional 2325 coin-type test cells, containing electrodes of sputtered films prepared in the same sputtering run, are identical for electrodes of the same composition. © 2003 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it