MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109781425 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2010.2046504

A Power Oscillation Damping Control Scheme Based on Bang-Bang Modulation of FACTS Signals

2010· article· en· W2109781425 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecRoyal Military College of CanadaÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)Electric power systemScheme (mathematics)Oscillation (cell signaling)Power controlRobust controlControl systemBang–bang controlModulation (music)EngineeringPower (physics)Computer scienceControl (management)PhysicsOptimal controlMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a new damping control scheme for FACTS devices, using bang-bang modulation of FACTS signals. The scheme is used to attenuate quickly the system's most dominant mode which is identified using online Prony analysis. An analysis framework to evaluate the robustness of the control schemes to changes in operating conditions and to time-delay is also proposed. Simulation results on various test systems show that following large disturbances, the proposed control scheme is very effective to mitigate the power system critical modes of oscillation. Furthermore, the problem of control interactions is completely avoided with the proposed control scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it