MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2109815289 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2003.1226211

The effect of dispersion on the bandwidth of distributed amplifier

2004· article· en· W2109815289 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmoud Mohammad‐Taheri, M.I. Elmasry

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoplanar waveguideDistributed amplifierInductanceAmplifierTransmission lineCapacitanceMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsBandwidth (computing)Electrical engineeringElectronic engineeringPhysicsEngineeringRF power amplifierTelecommunicationsMicrowaveVoltageCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new GaAs P-HEMT distributed amplifier that employs a coplanar waveguide (CPW) as a transmission line taking into account the effect of CPW dispersion on the performance of the amplifier. It is shown that a wide-band amplifier can be designed if the effect of CPW dispersion is kept as minimum as possible. The CPW is first modeled with a pi-section and the parameters (capacitance and inductance) of this model were obtained using its S-parameters with ADS software. From the capacitance and inductance per unit length of CPW line, the length of CPW is calculated to provide required characteristic impedance of artificial transmission line for distributed amplifier. The method of moment (MOM) is used to analysis the dispersion of CPW line. By removing the substrate between the signal and ground metal which makes CPW inductive and less dispersive, a 20% bandwidth enhancement and 17% size reduction were achieved which are of great important for MMIC applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→