MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109849414 · doi:10.1109/issse.2007.4294442

Random Antenna Selection & Antenna Swapping Combined with OSTBCs

2007· article· en· W2109849414 on OpenAlexafffund
Hani Mehrpouyan, Steven D. Blostein, Edmund C. Y. Tam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAntenna (radio)Selection (genetic algorithm)Block codeComputer scienceMIMOReduction (mathematics)AlgorithmSet (abstract data type)Block (permutation group theory)Iterative methodComputational complexity theoryMathematical optimizationMathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)TelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Decoding methodsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel and efficient iterative antenna selection algorithm based on an SNR selection criterion for a multi-input-multi-output (MIMO) system employing orthogonal space time block codes (OSTBCs), specifically Alamouti codes. The proposed algorithm addresses the open problem of finding a suboptimal set of transmit and receive antennas that performs close to the globally optimum configuration selection solution at significantly reduced complexity. Also, the paper is proposing a method to incrementally update the selected set of antennas, so as to enable even greater complexity reduction, and in particular, for the case of channels with temporal or time correlation. To date, antenna selection has not been assessed under temporal correlation. Simulation results show promising average bit error rate (ABER) performance gain after only a small number of iterations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207