Acute vasodilator effects of Rho-kinase inhibitors in neonatal rats with pulmonary hypertension unresponsive to nitric oxide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) in neonates is often refractory to the current best therapy, inhaled nitric oxide (NO). The utility of a new class of pulmonary vasodilators, Rho-kinase (ROCK) inhibitors, has not been examined in neonatal animals. Our objective was to examine the activity and expression of RhoA/ROCK in normal and injured pulmonary arteries and to determine the short-term pulmonary hemodynamic (assessed by pulse wave Doppler) effects of ROCK inhibitors (15 mg/kg ip Y-27632 or 30 mg/kg ip fasudil) in two neonatal rat models of chronic PHT with pulmonary vascular remodeling (chronic hypoxia, 0.13 Fi(O(2)), or 1 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) ip chronic bleomycin for 14 days from birth). Activity of the RhoA/ROCK pathway and ROCK expression were increased in hypoxia- and bleomycin-induced PHT. In both models, severe PHT [characterized by raised pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and impaired right ventricular (RV) performance] did not respond acutely to inhaled NO (20 ppm for 15 min) or to a single bolus of a NO donor, 3-morpholinosydnonimine hydrochloride (SIN-1; 2 mug/kg ip). In contrast, a single intraperitoneal bolus of either ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632 or fasudil) completely normalized PVR but had no acute effect on RV performance. ROCK-mediated vasoconstriction appears to play a key role in chronic PHT in our two neonatal rat models. Inhibitors of ROCK have potential as a testable therapy in neonates with PHT that is refractory to NO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".