Peroxidase activity in the intestinal tract of Wistar–Furth, BBc and BBdp rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The development of immune-mediated diabetes in BB rats may involve an inflammatory lesion of the intestinal tract. METHODS: In order to further explore this issue, the activity of peroxidase was measured, in the absence and presence of either bromide or dapsone, at day 10, 30, 45, 70, 95 and 120 in three segments (top, mid and bottom) of the intestinal tract from Wistar-Furth rats and both diabetes-resistant and diabetes-prone BB rats fed after weaning either diabetes-promoting diets or a protective diet, which decreases the incidence of diabetes in the BB rats. RESULTS: In the present study, from day 30 onwards, an age-related increase in peroxidase activity was found in the intestine of diabetes-prone BB rats (BBdp rats) fed diabetogenic diets, when compared with either Wistar-Furth or diabetes-resistant BB rats (BBc rats). This increase was most pronounced in the distal segments of the intestinal tract. Even when fed a protective diet, higher peroxidase activity was found in BBdp than BBc rats. Yet, in BBc rats, and to a lesser extent in BBdp rats, the diabetogenic diets lowered peroxidase activity below the value found in rats of the same strain fed the protective diet. There was a tight correlation between the activity of peroxidase and its susceptibility to be increased by bromide. CONCLUSION: It is proposed that diabetogenic diets may decrease peroxidase activity in intestinal cells, this effect becoming masked in BBdp rats by an age-related increase in the contribution of inflammatory cells. The latter phenomenon affects preferentially the distal segments of the intestinal tract.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".