MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109884526 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2005.1415132

Robust Pitch Estimation At Very Low SNR Exploiting Time and Frequency Domain Cues

2006· article· en· W2109884526 on OpenAlexaff
Celia Shahnaz, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPitch detection algorithmFrequency domainComputer scienceAutocorrelationTime domainSpeech recognitionFunction (biology)HarmonicWaveformA priori and a posterioriKernel (algebra)AcousticsMathematicsSpeech processingStatisticsPhysicsComputer visionTelecommunicationsRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a joint time/frequency domain approach for pitch estimation of speech at a very low SNR. The kernel of this approach lies in introducing a new function for detecting the time-domain cue by modifying the circular average magnitude difference function (CAMDF). By using the new function in conjunction with the half-wave rectified version of the autocorrelation function, the pitch-peak can be emphasized and the non-pitch peaks suppressed. To guarantee a robust pitch detection in noisy speech, a priori frequency-domain estimate of the dominant pitch-harmonic is extracted as an additional cue and is utilized to optimally match the pitch-peak in time-domain. The proposed approach is simulated using the Keele reference database. It is shown that the proposed method using joint time and frequency domain cues is able to give a superior accuracy relative to some of the existing methods even at a very low SNR of -10 dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207