MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detecting fast solvability of equations via small powerful Galois groups

2015· preprint· en· W2109906474 on OpenAlexaff
Sunil K. Chebolu, Ján Mináč, Claudio Quadrelli

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsRigidity (electromagnetism)Galois groupGalois moduleGalois extensionPure mathematicsQuotientMathematical proofRoot of unityCyclotomic fieldGroup (periodic table)CombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fix an odd prime p p , and let F F be a field containing a primitive p p th root of unity. It is known that a p p -rigid field F F is characterized by the property that the Galois group G F ( p ) G_F(p) of the maximal p p -extension F ( p ) / F F(p)/F is a solvable group. We give a new characterization of p p -rigidity which says that a field F F is p p -rigid precisely when two fundamental canonical quotients of the absolute Galois groups coincide. This condition is further related to analytic p p -adic groups and to some Galois modules. When F F is p p -rigid, we also show that it is possible to solve for the roots of any irreducible polynomials in F [ X ] F[X] whose splitting field over F F has a p p -power degree via non-nested radicals. We provide new direct proofs for hereditary

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207