MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109906825 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.1992.188186

Experimental performance of an adaptive digital linearized power amplifier

2003· article· en· W2109906825 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsNovAtel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierOperating pointElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Saturation (graph theory)Reduction (mathematics)Control theory (sociology)Bandwidth (computing)Computer scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present experimental results in which an adaptive complex gain predistorter achieved a reduction in out-of-band spectral emissions in excess of 20 dB for a class AB amplifier operating close to saturation. The experimental results demonstrate that a class AB power amplifier may be linearized without sacrificing efficiency. Although significant spectral reduction was achieved in the adjacent channel, the out-of-band spectral floor was flat and approximately -50 dB from the inband spectra. The complex gain predistorter exhibits two distinct advantages: a design engineer is not forced to back off a power amplifier to its linear but highly inefficient operating point; and adaptive correction allows the effects of frequency changes, drift in bias, operating point, aging and thermal stress to be readily compensated.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207