MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109917464 · doi:10.1534/genetics.108.097808

Rhythmic Conidiation in Constant Light in<i>Vivid</i>Mutants of<i>Neurospora crassa</i>

2009· article· en· W2109917464 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Schneider, Sabrina Perrino, Kim Oelhafen, Sanshu Li, Artiom Zatsepin, Patricia L. Lakin‐Thomas, Stuart Brody

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConidiationNeurospora crassaBiologyRhythmNeurosporaDarknessCircadian rhythmPeriod (music)Strain (injury)MutantMyceliumSporeBotanyGeneticsGeneAnatomyInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Neurospora crassa, a circadian rhythm of conidiation (asexual spore formation) can be seen on the surface of agar media. This rhythm has a period of 22 hr in constant darkness (D/D). Under constant illumination (L/L), no rhythm is visible and cultures show constant conidiation. However, here we report that strains with a mutation in the vivid (vvd) gene, previously shown to code for the photoreceptor involved in photo-adaptation, exhibit conidiation rhythms in L/L as well as in D/D. The period of the rhythm of vvd strains ranges between 6 and 21 hr in L/L, depending upon the intensity of the light, the carbon source, and the presence of other mutations. Temperature compensation of the period also depends on light intensity. Dark pulses given in L/L shift the phase of the rhythm. Shifts from L/L to D/D show unexpected after effects; i.e., the short period of a vvd strain in L/L gradually lengthens over 2-3 days in D/D. The rhythm in L/L requires the white collar (wc-1) gene, but not the frequency (frq) gene. FRQ protein shows no rhythm in L/L in a vvd strain. The conidiation rhythm in L/L in vvd is therefore driven by a FRQ-less oscillator (FLO).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeneticsSame topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207