Pierre Deffontaines, géographe de la « noosphère». Une lecture de Géographie et religions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La publication en 1948 de Géographie et religions par Pierre Deffontaines témoigne de l’intérêt nouveau des géographes pour le fait religieux. L’auteur présente son ouvrage comme la description minutieuse et exhaustive des marqueurs du religieux dans le paysage. Notre article montre que, à rebours du caractère descriptif du développement, les pages introductives et conclusives sont l’occasion pour l’auteur de revisiter le thème du déterminisme naturel en opérant un renversement original par rapport à la perspective classique. À un second niveau, Pierre Deffontaines propose en filigrane une définition personnelle de la géographie qui s’appuie sur des auteurs inattendus sous la plume d’un géographe, à savoir le Jésuite Pierre Teilhard de Chardin et le philosophe Henri Bergson. La géographie est alors présentée comme une discipline humaniste qui témoigne de l’action de la pensée dans la matière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".