Bibliographic record
Abstract
La résilience est un concept émanant de réalités vécues et permettant de mieux comprendre les divers facteurs qui, en interaction, aident la personne, la famille ou la communauté, à vivre malgré un sombre pronostic et à s’en sortir, parfois grandies. Cet article vise plusieurs objectifs : définir le concept de résilience ; décrire en quoi il diffère ou rejoint d’autre concepts tels que ceux de coping, d’empowerment, de sens de cohérence, mis de l’avant dans les interventions de réadaptation auprès des personnes présentant une déficience physique ; envisager le concept de résilience dans ses dimensions individuelle, familiale et communautaire ; mettre en parallèle les concepts de deuil et de résilience, car les personnes qui subissent un traumatisme ou vivent avec des incapacités physiques font face à des pertes et des deuils parfois multiples ; envisager les applications possibles de la résilience dans le domaine de la réadaptation physique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.155 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".