MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110029345 · doi:10.1109/icc.2011.5963002

E-TRAIL: Energy-Efficient Trail-Based Data Dissemination Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks with Mobile Sinks

2011· article· en· W2110029345 on OpenAlexaff
Richard W. Pazzi, Dipu Zhang, Azzedine Boukerche, Lynda Mokdad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceDisseminationComputer networkEnergy consumptionSink (geography)Efficient energy useDistributed computingScheduleProtocol (science)Real-time computingEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reliable, fast and energy-efficient data dissemination is one of the essential features for several applications in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). In the dawn of WSNs, data delivery techniques considered only static data sinks. However, static sink approaches place a considerable burden on sensor nodes surrounding the sinks in terms of traffic and energy consumption. Eventually, data dissemination techniques for WSNs with mobile sinks have been proposed to alleviate the traffic issues of static sink approaches and improve network lifetime. In this paper, we propose a new data dissemination strategy that combines a simple but efficient sleep schedule technique with a trail generation mechanism. Simulation results show that the proposed E-TRAIL protocol significantly improves network lifetime while maintaining similar data delivery success performance when compared to the selected approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207