MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110080834 · doi:10.7202/021769ar

Spatial Integration and Geographic Modernization : Review of Theories and Synthesis

2005· article· en· W2110080834 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de géographie du Québec · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Systems and Global Transformations
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModernization theoryContradictionEconomic geographyDialecticCentralityGeographyProcess (computing)Product (mathematics)Computer scienceEconomic growthEconomicsEpistemologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main concern of this paper is to combine the process of spatial integration with that of geographic modernization. Spatial integration is defined as a process by which the combination of centrality and marginality forms the basic contradiction of the spatial dialectic: the spatial struggle. Whereas geographic modernization is a process related to the development and the mutual transformation of terrestrial space and socio-economic formations leading to new spatial forms. The paper argues that the underlying mechanism of spatial integration is the geographic transfer of social surplus product. Whereas geographic modernization is the outcome of the geographic mobility of productive forces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it