MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110103407 · doi:10.5430/jhm.v3n1p1

Plasmacytoma cases with unfamiliar clinical features

2013· article· en· W2110103407 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ádám Jóna, Sándor Barna, Zsófia Miltényi, Lajos Gergely, Árpád Illés, László Váróczy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematological Malignancies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmacytomaMedicinePlasma cellMultiple myelomaMalignancyPlasma cell neoplasmRadiation therapyRadiologyPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plasmacytoma is a relatively rare form of plasma cell dyscrasias with indolent clinical features. Major localizations are in the upper airways and the region of head. Since it represents only a minority of all plasma cell neoplasms, careful histological review should be addressed to the specimens of these patients. In this paper the authors report three cases, developing plasmacytoma with uncommon clinical features. First patient had an unfamiliar localization of plasmacytoma in the cerebellopontine angle which was first meant to be malignant meningioma and later a large subcutaneous mass was detected in the gluteal region. Second patient developed plasmacytoma after a prostate adenocarcinoma as a secondary malignancy. Third patient, developed plasmacytoma and definite plasma cell myeloma with a coexistence of systemic sclerosis. Treating patients with chemo-radiotherapy, and irradiating the one with localized disease resulted in complete remission in two out of the three patients. Imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography combined with computed tomo- graphy (PET-CT) proved to be useful as tumor exploration tool, however multidisciplinary cooperation is recommended in these cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hematological MalignanciesSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207