MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Factors Affecting Consumer Willingness to Pay for Certified Traceable Food in Jiangsu Province of China

2012· article· en· W2110123281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Supply Chain Traceability
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGeneral Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsWillingness to payChinaAgricultural scienceCertificationPrice premiumFood safetyBusinessAgricultural economicsMarketingEconomicsWelfare economicsGeographyFood scienceManagementMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using data collected from a survey conducted in Jiangsu Province, China, we study consumer perceptions of and attitudes toward food traceability systems (FTS). Through econometric analysis, we examine the main factors that influence the willingness of consumers to pay a price premium for certified traceable food, as well as the actual premium these consumers are willing to bear. Our results indicate that an overwhelming majority of consumers in China are concerned about food safety, but consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) a price premium for certified traceable food is limited. Income, education, perception of and attitudes toward FTS, as well as the degree of concern over food safety, have significant effects on the consumer's WTP a price premium for certified traceable food. However, the effects of these factors on the actual premium a consumer is willing to pay are quite different. Conditioned on the consumer being willing to pay a positive price premium, income level and the degree of concern over food safety are the only two factors that have significant effects on the actual premium consumers are willing to pay. À partir de données tirées d’un sondage mené dans la province du Jiangsu, en Chine, nous avons étudié la perception et l’attitude des consommateurs envers les systèmes de traçabilité des aliments. À l’aide d’analyses économétriques, nous avons examiné les principaux facteurs qui influencent le consentement des consommateurs à payer un prix supérieur pour des aliments dont la traçabilité est certifiée ainsi que le prix réel qu’ils sont prêts à payer. Les résultats de notre étude indiquent qu’une très grande majorité de consommateurs en Chine sont préoccupés par la sécurité alimentaire, mais que leur consentement à payer un prix supérieur pour des aliments dont la traçabilité est certifiée est limité. Le revenu, le niveau de scolarité, la perception et l’attitude envers les systèmes de traçabilité, de même que le degré de préoccupation concernant la sécurité alimentaire, ont des effets considérables sur le consentement des consommateurs à payer un prix supérieur pour des aliments dont la traçabilité est certifiée. Toutefois, les effets de ces facteurs sur le prix réel qu’un consommateur est prêt à payer sont très différents. Lorsque des consommateurs consentent à payer un prix supérieur, le niveau de revenu et le degré de préoccupation concernant la sécurité alimentaire sont les deux seuls facteurs qui influencent fortement le prix réel qu’ils sont prêts à payer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it