MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110125673 · doi:10.1029/2000ja900093

Global three‐dimensional MHD simulation of a space weather event: CME formation, interplanetary propagation, and interaction with the magnetosphere

2000· article· en· W2110125673 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSolar windCoronal mass ejectionInterplanetary magnetic fieldMagnetosphereSpace weatherCorona (planetary geology)Magnetic cloudMagnetohydrodynamicsPolar windGeophysicsCoronal holeHeliosphereHeliospheric current sheetMagnetopauseField lineComputational physicsPlasmaAstrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A parallel adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) finite‐volume scheme for predicting ideal MHD flows is used to simulate the initiation, structure, and evolution of a coronal mass ejection (CME) and its interaction with the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. The simulated CME is driven by a local plasma density enhancement on the solar surface with the background initial state of the corona and solar wind represented by a newly devised “steady state” solution. The initial solution has been constructed to provide a reasonable description of the time‐averaged solar wind for conditions near solar minimum: (1) the computed magnetic field near the Sun possesses high‐latitude polar coronal holes, closed magnetic field flux tubes at low latitudes, and a helmet streamer structure with a neutral line and current sheet; (2) the Archimedean spiral topology of the interplanetary magnetic field is reproduced; (3) the observed two‐state nature of the solar wind is also reproduced with the simulation yielding fast and slow solar wind streams at high and low latitudes, respectively; and (4) the predicted solar wind plasma properties at 1 AU are consistent with observations. Starting with the generation of a CME at the Sun, the simulation follows the evolution of the solar wind disturbance as it evolves into a magnetic cloud and travels through interplanetary space and subsequently interacts with the terrestrial magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. The density‐driven CME exhibits a two‐step release process, with the front of the CME rapidly accelerating following the disruption of the near‐Sun closed magnetic field line structure and then moving at a nearly constant speed of ∼560 km/s through interplanetary space. The CME also produces a large magnetic cloud (> 100 R S across) characterized by a magnetic field that smoothly rotates northward and then back again over a period of ∼2 days at 1 AU. The cloud does not contain a sustained period with a strong southward component of the magnetic field, and, as a consequence, the simulated CME is somewhat ineffective in generating strong geo‐magnetic activity at Earth. Nevertheless, the simulation results illustrate the potential, as well as current limitations, of the MHD‐based space weather model for enhancing the understanding of coronal physics, solar wind plasma processes, magnetospheric physics, and space weather phenomena. Such models will provide the foundation for future, more comprehensive space weather prediction tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it