MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110152800 · doi:10.1002/chem.201000589

Hydrogen Adsorption and Diffusion in <i>p</i>‐<i>tert</i>‐Butylcalix[4]arene: An Experimental and Molecular Simulation Study

2010· article· en· W2110152800 on OpenAlexafffund
Saman Alavi, Tom K. Woo, Andrew Sirjoosingh, Stephen Lang, Igor Moudrakovski, John A. Ripmeester

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular SciencesUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsCalixareneAdsorptionChemistryDesorptionPulsed field gradientMolecular dynamicsDiffusionHydrogen bondMoleculeForce field (fiction)HydrogenAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Saturation (graph theory)Phase (matter)Physical chemistryBar (unit)ThermodynamicsOrganic chemistryComputational chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimental adsorption isotherms were measured and computer simulations were performed to determine the nature of the H(2) gas uptake in the low-density p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene (tBC) phase. (1)H NMR peak intensity measurements for pressures up to 175 bar were used to determine the H(2) adsorption isotherm. Weak surface adsorption (up to ≈2 mass % H(2) ) and stronger adsorption (not exceeding 0.25 mass % or one H(2) per calixarene bowl) inside the calixarene phase were detected. The latter type of adsorbed H(2) molecule has restricted motion and shows a reversible gas adsorption/desorption cycle. Pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR pressurization/depressurization measurements were performed to study the diffusion of H(2) in the calixarene phases. Direct adsorption isotherms by exposure of the calixarene phase to pressures of H(2) gas to ≈60 bar are also presented, and show a maximum H(2) adsorption of 0.4 H(2) per calixarene bowl. Adsorption isotherms of H(2) in bulk tBC have been simulated using grand canonical Monte Carlo calculations in a rigid tBC framework, and yield adsorptions of ≈1 H(2) per calixarene bowl at saturation. Classical molecular dynamics simulations with a fully flexible calixarene molecular force field are used to determine the guest distribution and inclusion energy of the H(2) in the solid with different loadings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207