MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110162838 · doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-185-6_7

And so it Goes on

2013· book-chapter· en· W2110162838 on OpenAlexaff
jan jagodzinski, Jason Wallin

Bibliographic record

VenueSensePublishers eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPejorativeFalse accusationInequalityInjusticeRedistribution (election)Social inequalityDemocracyEgalitarianismPolitical sciencePoliticsLaw and economicsIdentity (music)SociologyPolitical economyPositive economicsLawEconomicsPhilosophyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Educational research, by and large, has aided and abetted inequality in the name of equality in modernist democratic countries. Such an accusation seems difficult to believe or to swallow. How can the call to social equality and the call to social justice lead to inequality? This sounds counter-intuitive and patently false. However, if social injustice is continually defined by identity politics and the redistribution of knowledge (or of wealth for that matter) in the name of ‘progress,’ there will always be a ‘failure’ for the poor and the ‘stupid’ or ‘dumb’ (to use pejorative terms) will always lag behind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensePublishers eBooksSame topicGlobal Educational Policies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207