MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110184831 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4353868

Real-time Software Platform Design for In-Vivo Navigation of a Small Ferromagnetic Device in a Swine Carotid Artery Using a Magnetic Resonance Imaging System

2007· article· en· W2110184831 on OpenAlexaff
Arnaud Chanu, Sylvain Martel

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingComputer scienceSoftwareNavigation systemReal-time computingRadiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using an 1.5T Siemens clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging system (MRI), a 1.5 mm diameter ferromagnetic bead is moved across a pre-planned path in the carotid artery of a 25 kg living swine. The software architecture for the navigation and path planning is herein described. Using the real-time feedback capabilities of recent MRIs, the device is moved, controlled and tracked using the magnetic gradients coils already present for imaging purposes. Navigation of the ferromagnetic device has been achieved with a peak velocity of about 13 cm/s through a set of pre established 11 waypoints. The dedicated software architecture presented in this paper lies in a modified real-time MRI imaging sequence. The dedicated architecture permits the navigation of the ferromagnetic bead with an operating frequency of 24 Hz Real-time control of the magnetic core is achieved through the implementation of a simple 2D PID controller incorporated in the presented software platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topicSoft Robotics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207