MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110191567 · doi:10.4314/sokjvs.v11i1.7

Effect of management practices on milk yield and live weight changes of indigenous breeds of goats supplemented with groundnut haulms and concentrate in sub humid zone of Nigeria

2013· article· en· W2110191567 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hussaina Joan Makun, S.M. Otaru, D. D. Dung

Bibliographic record

VenueSokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsBreedGrazingAnimal scienceBiologyYield (engineering)LactationSignificant differenceMilk productionVeterinary medicineAgronomyMedicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These studies were carried out at the Research farm of National Animal Production Research Institute, Shika to investigate the effect of management practices on the milk yield and live weight changes of grazing Red Sokoto and Sahelian goats as influenced by supplementation with groundnut haulms and concentrate. Experiment 1 involved 5 Red Sokoto goats with average weight of 27.3 ± 1.37Kg kept either on-farm or on-station and fed groundnut haulms or concentrate. The result showed that management had significant effect on average daily gain (ADG) of kid at 146.7± 0.62g (P<0.01) and dam weight loss of -24.7±1.26g (P<0.05). Milk yield was less sustained on farm. Week of lactation affected milk yield ( P<0.01). In experiment 2, five goats of each of Red Sokoto or Sahelian breeds were randomly assigned to either groundnut haulms or concentrate as supplement. The results, showed that there were significant effect of breed (P<0.0001) and week (P<0.001) on milk yield, mean dam and kid weights respectively. The Red Sokoto dams had higher milk yield (414.1±47.19ml) than the Sahelian dams (203.2±46.61ml). Similarly, breed and type of supplementation fed showed significant difference (P<0.005) on milk yield. Red Sokoto dams fed concentrate produced more milk (555.1±64.92ml) than Sahelian fed concentrate (295.2±69.51ml) or groundnut haulms (111.4±69.51ml). Also in comparing the kid growth performance between on-farm and on-station, The average daily gain of kids was 112.9g± 0.53 was significantly influenced by week of lactation, while dam lost an average of 11.7±0.65g indicating that kids managed on farm were heavier than those on station. However dam on-station lost less weight than those on-farms. The result showed that supplementation of grazing does with diets of protein source irrespective of management will improve milk yield and that heavier dams supported better kid growth.Keywords: On-farm, On-station, Performance, Red Sokoto, Sahelian..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSokoto Journal of Veterinary SciencesSame topicRangeland Management and Livestock EcologyFrench-language works237,207