MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110192022 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2005.1557051

A parameterizable SIMD stream processor

2006· article· en· W2110192022 on OpenAlexaff
Aaftab Munshi, Alan Wong, A. Clinton, Sherman Braganza, William Bishop, Michael McCool

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceParallel computingSIMDStream processingComputer hardwareEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stream processing is a data processing paradigm in which long sequences of homogeneous data records are passed through one or more computational kernels to produce sequences of processed output data. Applications that fit this model include polygon rendering (computer graphics), matrix multiplication (scientific computing), 2D convolution (media processing), and data encryption (security). Computers that exploit stream computations process data faster than conventional microcomputers because they utilize a memory system and an execution model that increases on-chip bandwidth and delivers high throughput. We have designed a general-purpose, parameterizable, SIMD stream processor that operates on IEEE single-precision floating point data. The system is implemented in VHDL, and consists of a configurable FPU, execution unit array, and memory interface. The FPU supports pipelined operations for multiplication, addition, division, and square root. The data width is configurable. The execution array operates in lock-step with an instruction controller, which issues 32-bit instructions to the execution array. To exploit stream parallelism, the number of execution units as well as the number of interleaved threads is specified as a parameter at compilation time. The memory system allows all execution units to access one element of data from memory in every clock cycle. All memory accesses also pass through a routing network to support conditional reads and writes of stream data. Functional and timing simulations have been performed using a variety of benchmark programs. The system has also been synthesized into an Altera FPGA to verify resource utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207