Effect of intermittent umbilical cord occlusion on fetal respiratory activity and brain adenosine in late-gestation sheep
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It was hypothesized that intermittent umbilical cord occlusion (UCO) would inhibit ovine fetal breathing movements (FBM) in association with increased cerebral adenosine levels. To test this hypothesis, on two successive days during late gestation (133-134 days; term = 146 days), microdialysis samples were collected from the brains of 10 chronically instrumented fetal sheep during 2-h periods of complete UCO induced every 30 min (Day 1: 2-min UCOs; Day 2: 4-min UCOs). Control fetuses (n = 10) underwent no UCO. Tracheal pressure was measured throughout. This regimen resulted in a decrease in fetal arterial PO2 (PaO2) during each UCO to 7.3 +/- 0.8 mmHg (P<0.01; Day 1) and 8.4 +/- 1.1 mmHg (P<0.01; Day 2). Throughout each UCO period, fetal arterial pH (pHa) decreased to 7.28 +/- 0.02 (P<0.01; Day 1) and 7.11 +/- 0.07 (P<0.01; Day 2). The hourly incidence of FBM decreased significantly only on Day 2, from 38.6 +/- 4.1% to 4.1 +/- 1.6% (P<0.01). The frequency of deep isolated inspiratory efforts increased from 4.7 +/- 2.0 h(-1) to 17.6 +/- 6.1 h(-1) (P<0.05; Day 1) and from 2.2 +/- 0.9 h(-1) to 33.6 +/- 4 h(-1) (P<0.01; Day 2). The amplitude of both FBM and deep isolated inspiratory efforts increased during the UCO periods on both days. The concentration of cerebral extracellular fluid (ECF) adenosine during UCO increased by 219 +/- 215% (P<0.05; Day 1) and 172 +/- 107% (P<0.05; Day 2) over the baseline periods. In conclusion, the severity of the inhibitory effect of repeated UCO on FBM depends, in part, on the length of the occlusions. The inhibition of FBM during intermittent UCO may be mediated by the increase in ECF adenosine in the fetal brain. Furthermore, FBM and deep isolated inspiratory efforts appear to be regulated by different mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".