Orbit Rehabilitation with Extraoral Implants: Impact of Radiotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare the success rates of osseointegration among irradiated and nonirradiated cases submitted to implant placement for anchorage of orbit prostheses from 2003 to 2011. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charts of 45 consecutive patients were analyzed, 31 men and 14 women, and they were divided in two groups, considering previous irradiation therapy. Nonirradiated group had 33 patients, and irradiated group had 12 patients. In total, 138 implants were installed, 42 (30.4%) in previously irradiated bone. RESULTS: The overall implant survival rate was 96.4% with a success rate of 99.0% among the nonirradiated patients and 90.5% among the irradiated patients (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that irradiated sites had a worse prognosis related to success of osseointegration, although the 90.5% survival rate in this group indicates that implant placement is a feasible alternative to anchor orbit prostheses considering the benefits that this technique offers to patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".