4-1BB-Specific Monoclonal Antibody Promotes the Generation of Tumor-Specific Immune Responses by Direct Activation of CD8 T Cells in a CD40-Dependent Manner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4-1BB (CD137) is a member of the TNFR superfamily (TNFRSF9). T cell expression of 4-1BB is restricted to activated cells, and cross-linking has been shown to deliver a costimulatory signal. Here we have shown that treatment of tumor-bearing mice with agonistic 4-1BB-specific Abs can lead to T cell-mediated tumor rejection. In vivo mAb depletion experiments demonstrated that this rejection requires CD8(+) cells but not CD4(+) or NK cells. Both IFN-gamma- and CD40-mediated signals were also required, because no benefit was observed on treatment with 4-1BB mAb in mice in which the genes for these molecules had been knocked out. Interestingly, 4-1BB-mediated stimulation of immune responses in CD40L(-/-) mice is effective (although at a reduced level), and may suggest the existence of an alternative ligand for CD40. Additional experiments in IL-15(-/-) mice indicate that IL-15 is not required for either the generation of the primary tumor-specific immune response or the maintenance of the memory immune response. In contrast, the presence of CD4 cells during the primary immune response appears to play a significant role in the maintenance of effective antitumor memory. Finally, in mice in which the number of dendritic cells had been expanded by Fms-like tyrosine kinase3 ligand treatment, the antitumor effects of 4-1BB ligation were enhanced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".