Instruction in Dental Curricula to Identify and Assist Domestic Violence Victims
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since most domestic violence injuries occur in the head and neck areas, it is critical that dental professionals be prepared to identify, interview, and assist potential victims. The purposes of these surveys in 1996 and 2007 were to investigate U.S. and Canadian dental school curricula regarding the inclusion of domestic violence topics, determine the topics emphasized, determine beliefs of course directors about domestic violence issues, and report progress of dental curricula in preparing dental professionals regarding domestic violence over the eleven-year period. Surveys were sent to associate deans for academic affairs of dental schools in the United States and Canada in 1996 (N=64) and the United States in 2007 (N=56). Each academic dean was asked to forward the survey to the faculty member who taught this topic. Topics most frequently included and emphasized in dental school curricula were the responsibility of the health care professional (HCP) regarding domestic violence, how to identify physical and behavioral indicators, and how to refer the abused victim. The topics least frequently included and emphasized in the curricula regarded education of the abused and the impact of domestic violence on society. There were four strong beliefs reported by dental course directors: a trusting, professional rapport is essential for disclosure; the dentist or a dental team member may be the first HCP to recognize signs of abuse; the dentist has a professional responsibility to refer for assistance; and domestic violence education should be included in dental curricula. Over the eleven years, the surveys demonstrate that course directors have become more aware of the need to inform dental students about domestic violence and that more schools have increased the amount of information about domestic violence in dental courses. However, due to the complexity and sensitivity of this topic, course instructors in dental schools may consider other teaching methods to enhance learning. The authors identified the need for further course development and make recommendations to use experiential learning to enhance dental students' interpersonal and interviewing skills. These strategies may increase dentists' comfort and confidence when treating and assisting possible victims of domestic violence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".