MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110219185 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v5n3p33

Inflation Targeting and the Role of the Exchange Rate: The Case of the Czech Republic

2012· article· en· W2110219185 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yutaka Kurihara

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCzechExchange rateMonetary policyInflation targetingInflation (cosmology)EconomicsMonetary economicsFloating exchange rateDeregulationCentral bankInflation rateInternational economicsMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes the recent conduct of monetary and exchange rate policies in the Czech Republic. The Czech Republic entered 1993 as a newly independent country. It has introduced inflation targeting and floating exchange rate regime. The multidimensional nature of the inflationtargeting definition explains why there is no consensus about whether or not it should be employed. However, the Czech Republic experience with inflation targeting seems to have been satisfactory. The authority has succeeded in maintaining a stable and moderate rate of inflation while enjoying economic growth. The exchange rate also has been stable. Using the Taylor rule, this article shows that the monetary authority has managed financial policy adequately and that the central bank looks forward rather than backward when it formulates monetary policy. Moreover, the exchange rate system, regardless of free-floating rhetoric, does not heavily influence the conduct of monetary policy in the Czech Republic because the central bank need not manipulate the exchange rate strongly and knows that exchange rate policy does not have a strong effect on the exchange rate itself under the global economy and financial deregulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207