Étude comparative des caractéristiques internes et de l’environnement externe des communautés d’entraide francophone et anglophone de Sudbury-Manitoulin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La présente recherche porte sur la communauté d’entraide du district de Sudbury-Manitoulin(Ontario), secteur caractérisé, entre autres, par le multiculturalisme et le bilinguisme. Plus précisément,cette étude constitue une analyse comparative des communautés d’entraide francophoneet anglophone au niveau du champ d’intérêt des groupes, de leur organisation interne et de lanature des liens qu’il maintiennent avec leur environnement externe. Les résultats suggèrent queles groupes d’entraide des deux communautés en question diffèrent non seulement au point devue du nombre et de la diversité, mais également, et de façon significative, dans la nature desproblèmes traités et dans la participation du secteur professionnel. Il semble également y avoir unparallèle étroit entre l’organisation du système formel de soins de santé et des services sociaux etle développement de l’entraide dans les deux groupes étudiés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".