MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electron Trapping in 4H-SiC MOS Capacitors Fabricated by Sodium-Enhanced Oxidation

2012· article· en· W2110247084 on OpenAlexaff
A. F. Basile, A. C. Ahyi, L. C. Feldman, John R. Williams, P. M. Mooney

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCapacitorTrappingAnnealing (glass)CapacitanceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OxideDeep-level transient spectroscopyElectronOptoelectronicsComposite materialElectrical engineeringSiliconMetallurgyElectrodeVoltageChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrical properties of the SiO 2 /SiC interface fabricated by sodium-enhanced oxidation (SEO) of n-type 4H-SiC were studied by temperature-dependent C-V and constant-capacitance deep level transient spectroscopy (CCDLTS). With the exception of near-interface traps in the SiC epi-layer, which are not present in the SEO samples, the trap species observed in SEO capacitors are the same as those observed in both standard-oxidized and NO-annealed MOS capacitors. Total electron trapping in accumulation is comparable in SEO and NO-annealed capacitors; however, the traps in SEO capacitors are located at the interface whereas tunneling into oxide traps is observed in NO-annealed samples. A series of bias-temperature stress tests show that electron trapping is essentially unchanged when mobile sodium ions are moved toward the interface. The improved mobility attained by this process compared to NO annealing may be due to the absence of near-interface SiC traps in SEO samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207