MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110294335 · doi:10.1109/tns.2008.2008805

Relative Enhancement of a $^{3}{\rm He}$ Ion Chamber Response to Fast Neutrons by TOF Rejection of Slow Neutrons With a Pulsed Neutron Source

2009· article· en· W2110294335 on OpenAlexaff
W Matysiak, K. Chin, Scott A. McMaster, William V. Prestwich, Soo Hyun Byun

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear Physics and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutronNeutron temperatureProtonPhysicsIonization chamberNuclear physicsNeutron sourceIonIonizationAtomic physicsNeutron detectionLine (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As was found in our previous study, the presence of the thermal peak in neutron spectra measured by the3He ionization chamber makes it difficult to use its complete response function in an unfolding process. In order to significantly reduce the thermal peak counting rate, an active method of rejecting low energy neutrons (>180 eV) based on their time-of-flight has been developed and tested. The method required a modification of the proton accelerator beam line to produce short pulses of protons. The ratio of the number of detection events above thermal peak to the number of events scored in the thermal peak has been improved by a factor of 5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicNuclear Physics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207