MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2110360234 · doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.132779

The right ventricle: anatomy, physiology and clinical imaging

2008· review· en· W2110360234 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricleInterventricular septumCardiologyTricuspid valveInternal medicineAnatomyContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Not long ago the right ventricle (RV) was considered an “unnecessary” part of the normal circulation. While factually correct—ablation or replacement of the RV free wall can be well tolerated by experimental animals without reduction in cardiac output, and many surgical algorithms for congenital heart diseases culminate in a circulation devoid of a sub-pulmonary ventricle, a Fontan procedure, for example—it is clear that such circulations are far from normal. Furthermore, recent studies consistently demonstrate a central role for RV dysfunction in the prognosis and outcomes for a wide variety of acquired and congenital cardiac conditions. Consequently there has been a renewed interest in the singular role of the RV, as well as its influence on global function via biventricular interactions. In this review, we will discuss some of the challenges encountered in the measurement of RV volume and function in the context of the RV’s unique anatomic structure and physiology. The role of both ventricles is to propel blood forward in the circulation. To enable this mechanical role, ventricular function is intimately related to ventricular structure. However, the two ventricles differ. Morphologically, the RV is distinguished from the left ventricle (LV) by having coarser trabeculae, a moderator band, and a lack of fibrous continuity between its inlet and outflow valves. In the RV the pulmonary valve sits on a freestanding muscular infundibulum and the crista supraventricularis courses between it and the tricuspid valve to aid free wall contraction toward the interventricular septum. Because it normally operates at a lower pressure than the LV, the RV has a thinner wall. Its septal contour is indented by the dominant LV, producing a shape that is difficult to model geometrically (fig 1). Figure 1 Three dimensional reconstructions of the right ventricle (RV) illustrating its complex shape in a normal subject (A). RV remodelling in diseased hearts can result in profound shape change, as in this patient (B) with dilated RV due to severe pulmonary regurgitation following repair of tetralogy of Fallot. The mesh surface is the left ventricle. LV, left ventricle; P, pulmonary valve; RV, right ventricle; T, tricuspid valve. See Sheehan and Bolson14 for explanation of reconstruction method. Nearly all studies of ventricular fibre structure were performed on the LV.1 Dissection studies showed that its fibres course …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.380 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it