One-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation of SSM/I Observations in Rainy Atmospheres at MSC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Currently, satellite radiances in the Canadian Meteorological Centre operational data assimilation system are only assimilated in clear skies. A two-step method, developed at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, is considered to assimilate Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) observations in rainy atmospheres. The first step consists of a one-dimensional variational data assimilation (1DVAR) method. Model temperature and humidity profiles are adjusted by assimilating either SSM/I brightness temperatures or retrieved surface rain rates (derived from SSM/I brightness temperatures). In the second step, 1DVAR column-integrated water vapor analyses are assimilated in four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVAR). At the Meteorological Service of Canada, such a 1DVAR assimilation system has been developed. Model profiles are obtained from a research version of the Global Environmental Multi-Scale model. Several issues raised while developing the 1DVAR system are addressed. The impact of the size of the observation error is studied when brightness temperatures are assimilated. For two case studies, analyses are derived when either surface rain rate or brightness temperatures are assimilated. Differences in the analyzed fields between these configurations are discussed and shortcomings of each approach are identified. Results of sensitivity studies are also provided. First the impact of observation error correlation between channels is investigated. Second, the size of the background temperature error is varied to assess its impact on the analyzed column-integrated water vapor. Third, the importance of each moist physical scheme is investigated. Finally, the portability of moist physical schemes specifically developed for data assimilation is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".