Development of a dynamic continuous-discrete-continuous model describing the lag phase of individual bacterial cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: A previous model for adaptation and growth of individual bacterial cells was not dynamic in the lag phase, and could not be used to perform simulations of growth under non-isothermal conditions. The aim of the present study was to advance this model by adding a continuous adaptation step, prior to the discrete step, to form a continuous-discrete-continuous (CDC) model. METHODS AND RESULTS: The revised model uses four parameters: N(0), initial population; N(max), maximum population; p0, mean initial individual cell physiological state; SD(p0), standard deviation of the distribution of individual physiological states. A truncated normal distribution was used to generate tables of distributions to allow fitting of the CDC model to viable count data for Listeria monocytogenes grown at 5 degrees C to 35 degrees C. The p0 values increased with increasing SD(p0) and were, on average, greater than the corresponding population physiological states (h0); p0 and h0 were equivalent for individual cells. CONCLUSION: The CDC model has improved the ability to simulate the behaviour of individual bacterial cells by using a physiological state parameter and a distribution function to handle inter-cell variability. The stages of development of this model indicate the importance of physiological state parameters over the population lag concept, and provide a potential approach for making growth models more mechanistic by incorporating actual physiological events. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Individual cell behaviour is important in modelling bacterial growth in foods. The CDC model provides a means of improving existing growth models, and increases the value of mathematical modelling to the food industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".